Walter Craddock other

Complaint: walter craddock, former corrupt police chief of the cranston rhode island police department, who oversaw the rigging of the 2002 cranston mayoral election that saw steve laffey attempt to eliminate his competition through false police reports filed by friends and family and political allies that netted the cranston police department undeserved pension and safety complex as rewards at the expense of innocent individuals, has used his treachery to also bring corruption to the rhode island DMV as its director and head, to the providence center as a director, to bristol community college as a professor and on his own as a private attorney. craddock is an ill fit as a boad member at the providence center which is a mental health center that was used by craddock during his days as police chief to force perfectly fine individuals to visit whenever he himself or hs fellow cops commited some form of impropriety that would cause them to get in trouble. Invariably, this police department would send individuals to this facility, and/or fatima hospital, to attempt to gain a false mental health diagnosis that would exculpate them from blame. It is a racket and craddock, as an overseer of this facility, can now attempt to help his cop friends whenever they commit a crime or are going to be sued by spreading his corruption and influence on those who work there to achieve his desired result. The whole thing is a scheme and he has utilized his connections with individuals like corrupt judge (((REDACTED))), judge (((REDACTED))), cranston attorney robert murray, rhode island bridge and tranist director earl “buddy”” croft

Tags: Lawyer Complaint, Medical Agency, Mental Institutions, Police, Political Cover-ups, Politicians

Address: and underling officers like matthew davis

Website: hendricken coaches david exter and keith croft and jason pilderian

Phone: erik baccari

Share Review:
Yes it is. Based on the user review published on, it is strongly advised to avoid Walter Craddock other in any dealing and transaction.
Not really. In spite of the review published here, there has been no response from Walter Craddock other. Lack of accountability is a major factor in determining trust.
Because unlike, other websites get paid to remove negative reviews and replace them with fake positive ones.
Walter Craddock other is rated 1.67 out of 5 based on the reviews submitted by our users and is marked as POOR.
Never trust websites which offer a shady ‘advocacy package’ to businesses. Search for relevant reviews on Ripoff Report and Pissed Consumer to see more unbiased reviews.
The above review and comments against Walter Craddock other were submitted by user(s) and have been published as-is. does not edit, alter or remove content published by it’s users. There’s no amount of money a business can pay to manipulate their reviews or complaints and will NOT entertain any request to remove the review on Walter Craddock other at any cost whatsoever.